设为首页
投稿信箱
加入收藏
| 首页 | 声明·公告| 国际人权 |热线咨询 | 调查 | 人物 | 法援 | 奥运观察 | 评论 |维权手册| 人权个案 |维权动态| 公民行动 | 小型资助 |
您现在的位置: 维权网 >> 文章中心 >> ENGLISH >> Statements >> 正文
相 关 文 章
Special Series on Human Rights
Hu Jia's Trial for "Inciti
China Human Rights Briefing(Fe
China Human Rights Briefing, F
Chinese Human Rights Briefing,
Police Stepped up Harassment o
Lu Gengsong Sentenced to Four 
Hu Jia Formally Arrested
US calls arrest of Chinese act
While in Beijing...What a '
专 题 栏 目
· 新闻言论自由  · 强迫拆迁
· 反污染维权  · 农民土地维权
· 劳工权益  · 妇女权益
· 上访事件  · 煤矿灾案
· 宗教迫害  · 艾滋病关怀
· 结社集会权  · 儿童教育权
· 健康卫生权  · 死刑观察
· 酷刑观察  · 废除任意羁押
最 新 热 门
固顶文章“ 同一个世界,同一个梦想”:同
推荐文章黄海华:致全体公民奴的公开信
普通文章[组图]Silencing Complaints
推荐文章[图文]民间媒体准备出版《于佃荣
推荐文章[组图]一个老工人的苦难自传【用
推荐文章[组图]黑奴于佃荣征寻代理律师起
推荐文章[图文]黑奴于佃荣案会成为第二个
推荐文章于佃荣——一个悲惨的平民
推荐文章北京公安用恐怖手段压制维权,非
推荐文章于佃荣:他们是在伤害我?还是在
最 新 推 荐
固顶文章“ 同一个世界,同一个梦想”:同
推荐文章黄海华:致全体公民奴的公开信
普通文章[组图]Silencing Complaints
推荐文章[图文]民间媒体准备出版《于佃荣
推荐文章[组图]一个老工人的苦难自传【用
推荐文章[组图]黑奴于佃荣征寻代理律师起
推荐文章[图文]黑奴于佃荣案会成为第二个
推荐文章于佃荣——一个悲惨的平民
推荐文章北京公安用恐怖手段压制维权,非
推荐文章于佃荣:他们是在伤害我?还是在
  Hu Jia on Trial: Rights to Free Speech and Due Process Violated         ★★★
Hu Jia on Trial: Rights to Free Speech and Due Process Violated
作者:CHRD 文章来源:CHRD 点击数: 更新时间:2008-3-19 0:16:54

Hu Jia on Trial: Rights to Free Speech and Due Process Violated
CHRD calls for the activist's immediate and unconditional release
 

(Chinese Human Rights Defenders, March 18, 2008) - The trial of Hu Jia (胡佳), the prominent human rights defender arrested on suspicion of "inciting subversion of state power," took place today at the Beijing Municipal No. 1 Intermediate People's Court. The court is to announce the verdict at a later date.    

Hu's trial started at 9:30 a.m. During the 4-hour trial, Hu's lawyers, Li Jingsong (李劲松) and Li Fangping (李方平), were allowed only 20 minutes to speak. The lawyers had not finished reading out their defense when they were cut off by the judge. The lawyers attempted to speak four times after that, but they were immediately stopped each time because, according to the judge, their arguments were "irrelevant".

The charge against Hu centers on six articles and two press interviews he gave, all of them discuss issues of human rights violations. Hu pleaded not guilty to the charge.

"This is yet another incident where the law is used to persecute free speech! It flies directly in the face of the Chinese leaders who repeatedly claim that China is a 'country with the rule of law!' said Renee Xia, international director of CHRD. 

Although the trial was supposed to be public, Hu's father, his wife (Zeng Jinyan, 曾金燕), and a number of foreign diplomats were barred from attending it. According to the authorities, Hu's father and wife were barred from the trial because they are "witnesses" to the case and have previously been questioned in connection to it. Hu's mother was allowed to attend the trial.  The courtroom was otherwise packed with a dozen court officials and police officers.

About 50 journalists waited outside of the court. The authorities have taken away a number of Hu's outspoken friends and supporters in Beijing and brought them to locations outside of the capital to prevent them from speaking with journalists.

CHRD calls for Hu's immediate and unconditional release.

Since the prosecutors' only "evidence" against Hu consists of articles he wrote and press interviews he gave that discuss human rights issues, CHRD believes that Hu is being prosecuted solely for peacefully exercising his rights to freedom of expression and to defend human rights. The right to freedom of expression is guaranteed in Article 35 of the Chinese Constitution and Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR, which China has signed but not yet ratified).

CHRD deplores the denial of Hu's right to due process, which is guaranteed in China's Criminal Procedure Law as well as Article 14 of the ICCPR. Hu's trial was unfair on several grounds. During the trial, his lawyers were given much less time to speak compared to his prosecutors, thus violating the principle of equality which is essential in a fair trial. The trial was effectively closed to the public, as Hu's immediate family members and his supporters were barred from attending it. 

The processes of investigation and interrogation prior to Hu's trial were equally flawed. In the first month of his detention, Hu was deprived of access to legal counsel and to his family. Then, only one of his two lawyers was allowed to visit him. He was repeatedly interrogated for up to 14 hours each time, usually at night. And then, the court gave insufficient time—seven days only—for his lawyers to study the large volume of case files in preparation for his defense.

For more information, please see:

Hu Jia's Trial for "Inciting Subversion of State Power" Scheduled for March 18 (March 13, 2008)
Hu Jia Formally Arrested: Authorities Impervious To International Protest (January 31, 2008)
Detained Activist Hu Jia Denied Access to Lawyer, His Family Harassed (January 6, 2008)
Beijing Activist Hu Jia Detained on Suspicion of "Inciting Subversion of State Power" (December 28, 2007)

For more information about "inciting subversion of state power", please see:
"Inciting Subversion of State Power":A Legal Tool for Prosecuting Free Speech in China (January 8, 2008)

文章录入:夏浓    责任编辑:夏浓 
  • 上一篇文章:

  • 下一篇文章: 没有了
  • 【字体: 】【发表评论】【加入收藏】【告诉好友】【打印此文】【关闭窗口
      网友评论:(只显示最新10条。评论内容只代表网友观点,与本站立场无关!)
    | 设为首页 | 加入收藏 | 联系站长 | 友情链接 | 关于我们 |
    Copyright2006 维权网版权所有